Logical semi-realities

I

"You don't need to be gay to be gay."

(even my dreams are reached by my anti-essentialism, lol)


II

—I’m a classical logician. I don’t need semantics, that’s too model theory for me. Syntax is enough.

—That's bonkers, you are not. In fact, you laugh that hard at my meme because you applied multiple semantic interpretations to it at once, and you know it.


Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

Apuntes matemáticas (UB)

¿Por qué ya no nos vemos?

Panta rei: una reseña de "De(s) Amor, Coraje y Cáncer" de Encar González Gall