Logical semi-realities

I

"You don't need to be gay to be gay."

(even my dreams are reached by my anti-essentialism, lol)

II

—I’m a classical logician. I don’t need semantics, that’s too model theory for me. Syntax is enough.

—That's bonkers, you are not. In fact, you laugh that hard at my meme because you applied multiple semantic interpretations to it at once, and you know it.